Friday, May 26

Writing a Murder Mystery: The First Victim


Writing a Murder Mystery: The First Victim


The first murder victim is unique.

Of course talking about a first victim assumes there will be more than one murder victim. True. But, these days, most murder mysteries DO include more than one victim.

And, honestly, I think it’s easier to structure a murder mystery that has more than one murder. I’ll talk more about story structure later on in this series. (By the way, this post is part of a series on How to Write a Murder Mystery.)

Note: I've included this material in my book: How to Write a Murderously Good Mystery: The Major Characters.

3 Things That Make the First Victim Special


1. The first victim brings the detective into the story.


The discovery of the first victim’s body CREATES the Inciting Incident. Regardless of the murderer’s motives, the first victim summons the detective and in this sense they are the reason for everything.

2. Usually, the relationship between the killer and the first victim ties the victims and the suspects together.


In traditional murder mysteries, killers kill for a reason. They have a motive. Since, often, the first victim is the only one the murderer intended to kill, the second, third, etc., victims are killed to tie up loose ends. In this sense, the killer’s motive for dispatching the first victim is either directly or indirectly responsible for all the other deaths.

3. Since the murderer is trying to tie up loose ends, subsequent murders are often more spontaneous than premeditated.


Often, the second and subsequent murders are committed because something went wrong with the first and the murderer is forced to improvise. Or if the first killing was a crime of passion—in other words, there was no plan, the killing was not at all premeditated—the subsequent murders would be done to cover the murderer’s tracks and so could be sloppy and rushed. And THIS—this lack of finesse—could itself be a clue.

Other factors:


The murderer plans for multiple victims rather than just one.


Granted, it isn’t always the case that the murderer begins his crime spree only intending to kill one person. Sometimes the murderer has a list of people who he feels either did him wrong or who harmed someone he loves. Or perhaps the murderer has a goal and to reach this goal he will have to kill more than one person.

A classic example of this often has to do with a tontine. With a tontine, a number of people contribute to a fund. As each of them die the fund grows larger. When the second to last person dies the final survivor controls the remaining capital. This provided the motive for no end of murders—at least in stories!

Also, although it didn’t have anything to do with a tontine, Agatha Christie’s most popular novel—And Then There Were None—features a murderer who intended to kill absolutely everyone, the entire cast of characters!

In this case the first murder victim isn’t as important, though the detective won’t know that. In this case sometimes the murderer intends the first murder to be a distraction. For instance, in Agatha Christie’s Murder Three Act Tragedy the first murder is a trial run. The murderer had nothing against the first victim—in fact, the first victim was randomly chosen!—he was simply testing out his murder method.

Wrap Up


I’ve found that in many murder mystery stories, the second, third, and so on, murders usually are a response to factors that unfold AFTER the initial crime.

Often, though not always.

Sometimes the murderer intends to kill two or more people, though even in these cases additional murders can occur as plans unravel and the murderer, panicked, tries to tie up loose ends.

Whatever the case, the murderer is changed by the first murder. He or she is now a different person. This can be shown in a number of ways. After this, the stakes are higher, they wonder if the police suspect them, their stress levels increase. Depending on how good the murderer is at dealing with stress, this could lead to them making mistakes, blurting out information they should have kept quiet about, or doing something rash because they're driven by fear.

In my next post I'll talk more about how to create a murder victim.



Every post I pick something I believe in and recommend it. This serves two purposes. I want to share what I like with you, and, if you click the link and buy anything over at Amazon within the next 24 hours, Amazon puts a few cents in my tip jar at no cost to you. So, if you click the link, thank you! If not, that’s okay too. I’m thrilled and honored you’ve visited my blog and read my post.

Today I’m recommending a book, a murder mystery, I’ve read a number of times. Each time I discovered something new and valuable! I’m talking about Agatha Christie’s most popular murder mystery: And Then There Were None.

From the blurb: “The world's best-selling mystery with over 100 million copies sold! / Ten people, each with something to hide and something to fear, are invited to a lonely mansion on Indian Island by a host who, surprisingly, fails to appear. On the island they are cut off from everything but each other and the inescapable shadows of their own past lives. One by one, the guests share the darkest secrets of their wicked pasts. And one by one, they die…”




5 comments:

  1. That's a wonderful post. I am new to your blog.I have a small question. Why is the classical murder mysteries like Agatha Christie, Sherlock Holmes etc totally different from today's crime thrillers? If I am not wrong we are not using the term murder mysteries anymore but suspense thrillers. The feel is completely different. Why is it so?

    Regards
    Shalet
    (www.shaletrjimmy.blogspot.com)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Shalet! IMHO Agatha Christie wrote what have come to be known as Traditional English Murder Mysteries. Her work went a long way to defining that particular subgenre of murder mystery. But that's just ONE subgenre, there are MANY. That said, a thriller is a different beast than a murder mystery, it's a different genre. Readers come to a murder mystery with significantly different expectations than a thriller. That said, the two genre do share many things in common. For instance, both kinds of stories have suspense and a murderer!

      I've written about how murder mysteries different from thrillers, here's the link:
      http://blog.karenwoodward.org/2017/02/8-ways-thriller-differs-from-mystery.html

      Thanks for your comment! :-)

      Delete
  2. Good day

    I was wondering, for a first detective story, if i should avoid a modern setting.
    I have limited knowledge on how police and CSI works and all that modern technology.

    Also, if i decide to write a story setting place in the 70s (example), it seems harder without DNA testing
    to find suspects and the murderer.

    Thanks in advance

    Mario

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Mario, sorry for the late reply! I wasn't getting notifications and just discovered your comment. Okay, about your question, this is just my opinion, but I think if you're going to use a real setting, whether historical or present day, you'll likely need to do some research. I'm not sure what you'll think of this suggestion, but one possible way around this is to set your novel in a fantasy setting. You could design your own rules for magic, etc. Write your own history! It's a thought. Whatever you decide to do, all the best. :-)

      Delete

Because of the number of bots leaving spam I had to prevent anonymous posting. My apologies. I do appreciate each and every comment.